Overview

Market: Las Vegas, NV — Criminal Defense & Personal Injury Last updated: March 29, 2026 Source analysis: Competitive Analysis

Fumo Law and The Defense Firm share the Las Vegas criminal defense market and therefore share the same competitor set. All competitor profiles are maintained in the TDF competitors directory to avoid duplication.

---

Competitor Profiles

All profiles are located at ../../the-defense-firm/competitors/:

#	Firm	Threat Level	Profile
1	Goodman Law Group	High	Profile
2	Hofland & Tomsheck	High	Profile
3	Las Vegas Defense Group	High	Profile
4	LV Criminal Defense	Medium	Profile
5	Draskovich Horvath	Low	Profile
6	Brown Law Offices	Low-Medium	Profile
7	De Castroverde Law Group	High	Profile
8	The Defenders	Medium-High	Profile
9	Spartacus Criminal Defense	Low	Profile
10	Joel M. Mann	Low-Medium	Profile

---

Fumo Law-Specific Priorities

Unlike TDF, Fumo Law faces unique competitive challenges:

1. URGENT: Review volume crisis — 27 Google reviews for a 6-attorney firm established in 1996 is the single biggest competitive gap in this market
2. Leverage existing strengths — Best Lawyers in America (3 attorneys), AV Preeminent, largest criminal defense firm in NV, practicing since 1974
3. Individual attorney Avvo profiles — Each of the 6 attorneys needs a claimed, complete, and actively reviewed Avvo profile
4. Forbes Advisor candidacy — Strong credentials but review volume is a dealbreaker; fix reviews first

See the full Competitive Analysis for detailed recommendations.

---

Personal Injury Competitors

Fumo Law’s PI practice (attorneys Dustin Marcello and Kendall Stone) handles auto accidents, commercial vehicle accidents, wrongful death, and traumatic brain injuries. The Las Vegas PI market is a separate competitive landscape from criminal defense, with different dominant players.

Fumo Law and Pacific West Injury Law compete against the same set of Las Vegas PI firms. All competitor profiles are maintained in the PWI competitors directory to avoid duplication.

All PI profiles are located at ../../pacific-west-injury/competitors/:

#	Firm	Threat Level	Profile
1	Richard Harris Law Firm	High	Profile
2	Ed Bernstein & Associates	High	Profile
3	Lerner and Rowe Injury Attorneys	High	Profile
4	Naqvi Injury Law	High	Profile
5	Benson & Bingham	High	Profile
6	Dimopoulos Injury Law	High	Profile
7	Adam S. Kutner	High	Profile
8	Ladah Law Firm	Medium-High	Profile
9	Valiente Mott	Medium-High	Profile
10	Gina Corena & Associates	Medium-High	Profile

Additional PI competitors (lower threat): Battle Born Injury Lawyers, Eglet Law, Henness & Haight, Shook & Stone — see full list.

Note: De Castroverde Law Group also handles personal injury and is profiled as a criminal defense competitor above (via TDF). See their profile.

---

Fumo Law PI-Specific Priorities

Fumo Law’s PI practice faces even steeper competitive challenges than its criminal defense practice:

1. Review volume is critical — Fumo has ~27 Google reviews total (shared across criminal defense and PI). The top PI competitors have hundreds to thousands (Dimopoulos: 3,278; Kutner: 2,600+; PWI: 755+). This is an existential gap for local SEO visibility.
2. No published verdict/settlement figures — Competitors lead with “$400M recovered” (Ladah), “$600M” (Benson & Bingham), “$1B+” (Lerner and Rowe). Fumo’s PI practice needs to compile and publish its results.
3. Brand identity for PI — Fumo Law is primarily known for criminal defense. The PI practice needs distinct positioning to compete against PI-focused firms.
4. TBI and commercial vehicle niche — These are Fumo’s differentiating PI sub-areas. Most competitors offer these services but few lead with them. This is a potential SEO and content marketing opportunity.
5. Leverage criminal defense credentials — Best Lawyers in America (3 attorneys), AV Preeminent, and 50+ year history are unusual credentials for a PI practice and should be featured prominently.

To research a new competitor, use the competitor-profile prompt.